Costs are the biggest problem with
mutual funds. These costs eat into your return, and they are the main
reason why the majority of funds end up with poor performance. What's even more
disturbing is the way the fund industry hides costs through a layer
of financial complexity and jargon. Some critics of the industry say that
mutual fund companies get away with the fees they charge only because
the average investor does not understand what he/she is paying for.
Fees can be broken down into two
categories:
1. Ongoing yearly fees to keep you invested in the fund.
2. Transaction fees paid when you buy or sell shares in a fund (loads).
The Expense Ratio:-
1. Ongoing yearly fees to keep you invested in the fund.
2. Transaction fees paid when you buy or sell shares in a fund (loads).
The Expense Ratio:-
The ongoing expenses of a mutual
fund are represented by the expense ratio. This is sometimes
also referred to as the management expense ratio (MER). The expense
ratio is composed of the following:
1. The cost of hiring the fund manager(s) - Also known as the
management fee, this cost is between 0.5% and 1% of assets on average.
While it sounds small, this fee ensures that mutual fund managers remain
in the country's top echelon of earners. Fund managers are definitely not going
hungry! It's true that paying managers is a necessary fee, but don't think
that a high fee assures superior performance.
2. Administrative costs - These include necessities such as postage,
record keeping, customer service, cappuccino machines, etc. Some funds are
excellent at minimizing these costs while others (the ones with the
cappuccino machines in the office) are not.
3. The last part of the ongoing fee this expense
goes toward paying brokerage commissions and toward advertising and
promoting the fund. That's right, if you invest in a fund, you are paying
for the fund to run commercials and sell itself!
On the whole, expense ratios range
from as low as 0.2% (usually for index funds) to as high as 2%. The
average equity mutual fund charges around 1.3%-1.5%. You'll generally pay
more for specialty or international funds, which require more expertise from
managers.
In case you are still curious, here is how certain loads
work:
1. Front-end loads - These are the
most simple type of load: you pay the fee when you purchase the fund.
If you invest 1,000 in a mutual fund with a 5% front-end load, 50 will pay
for the sales charge, and 950 will be invested in the fund.
2. Back-end loads (also known as
deferred sales charges) - These are a bit more complicated. In such a
fund you pay a back-end load if you sell a fund within a certain time
frame. A typical example is a 6% back-end load that decreases to 0% in the
seventh year. The load is 6% if you sell in the first year, 5% in the
second year, etc. If you don't sell the mutual fund until the seventh
year, you don't have to pay the back-end load at all.
A no-load fund sells its shares without a commission or sales charge. Some in the mutual fund industry will tell you that the load is the fee that pays for the service of a broker choosing the correct fund for you. According to this argument, your returns will be higher because the professional advice put you into a better fund. There is little to no evidence that shows a correlation between load funds and superior performance. In fact, when you take the fees into account, the average load fund performs worse than a no-load fund.
A no-load fund sells its shares without a commission or sales charge. Some in the mutual fund industry will tell you that the load is the fee that pays for the service of a broker choosing the correct fund for you. According to this argument, your returns will be higher because the professional advice put you into a better fund. There is little to no evidence that shows a correlation between load funds and superior performance. In fact, when you take the fees into account, the average load fund performs worse than a no-load fund.
No comments:
Post a Comment